Performance evaluation of Bayesian and frequentist approaches for longitudinal modelling: application to Alzheimer’s disease

0
  • Bernal-Rusiel, JL, Greve, DN, Reuter, M., Fischl, B. & Sabuncu, MR Statistical analysis of longitudinal neuroimage data with linear mixed-effects models. Neuroimaging 66249-260 (2013).

    Google Scholar article

  • Cespedes, MI et al. Comparisons of neurodegeneration over time between healthy aging and Alzheimer’s disease cohorts via Bayesian inference. BMJ open sevene012174 (2017).

    Google Scholar article

  • Ziegler, G., Penny, WD, Ridgway, GR, Ourselin, S. & Friston, KJ Estimation of anatomical trajectories with Bayesian mixed effects modeling. Neuroimaging 12151–68 (2015).

    CAS Google Scholar Article

  • Bliese, PD Intra-group agreement, non-independence and reliability: implications for data aggregation and analysis (OpenScience, 2000).

    Google Scholar

  • Guerrero, R. et al. Instantiated modeling of the mixed effects of Alzheimer’s disease markers. Neuroimaging 142113–125 (2016).

    CAS Google Scholar Article

  • Rivera-Lares, K., Logie, R., Baddeley, A. & Della Sala, S. The rate of forgetting is independent of the initial degree of learning. Same. To know. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01271-1 (2022).

    PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Kieser, M., Friede, T. & Gondan, M. Assessing statistical significance and clinical relevance. Med Statistics 321707-1719 (2013).

    MathSciNet ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Rijn, MHC, Bech, A., Bouyer, J., and Van Den Brand, JAJG Statistical significance versus clinical relevance. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 326–12 (2017).

    Google Scholar

  • Aksman, LM et al. Longitudinal imaging biomarker modeling with multi-task Bayesian parametric learning. Hmm. Brain mapping. 403982–4000 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • Interim, AGM et al. How Bayesian statistics can help answer some of the controversial questions in clinical research on Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s dementia. 17917–919 (2021).

    Google Scholar article

  • Lesaffre, E. & Lawson, AB Bayesian biostatistics (Wiley, 2012).

    Book Google Scholar

  • Wilkinson, M. Distinguishing between statistical significance and practical/clinical significance using statistical inference. Med. athletic. 44295–301 (2014).

    Google Scholar article

  • Hespanhol, L., Vallio, CS, Costa, LM & Saragiotto, BT Understanding and interpreting confidence and credibility intervals around effect estimates. Bras. J.Phys. The. 23290-301 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • Berry, DA Bayesian clinical trials. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 527–36 (2006).

    CAS Google Scholar Article

  • Gurrin, LC, Kurinczuk, JJ & Burton, PR Bayesian Statistics in Medical Research: An Intuitive Alternative to Conventional Data Analysis. J. Eval. Clin. Practice. 6193–204 (2000).

    CAS Google Scholar Article

  • van de Schoot, R., Winter, SD, Ryan, O., Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M. & Depaoli, S. A systematic review of Bayesian papers in psychology: The past 25 years. Psychol. Methods 22217-239 (2017).

    Google Scholar article

  • Wagenmakers, EJ et al. Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical benefits and practical ramifications. Psychone. Bull. Round. 2535–57 (2018).

    Google Scholar article

  • Jack, CR et al. Tracking pathophysiological processes in Alzheimer’s disease: an updated hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers. Neurol lancet. 12207-216 (2013).

    CAS Google Scholar Article

  • Hardy, J. Amyloid, presenilins and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience Trends. 20154-159 (1997).

    CAS Google Scholar Article

  • Jack, CR et al. NIA-AA research framework: Towards a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s dementia. 14535–562 (2018).

    Google Scholar article

  • Petersen, RC et al. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): Clinical Characterization. Neurology 74201-209 (2010).

    Google Scholar article

  • Caroli, A. & Frisoni, GB The dynamics of Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort. Neurobiol. Aging 311263-1274 (2010).

    CAS Google Scholar Article

  • Dickerson, BC et al. MRI-derived entorhinal and hippocampal atrophy in incipient, very mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 22747–754 (2001).

    CAS Google Scholar Article

  • Jack, CR et al. Rates of hippocampal atrophy correlate with change in clinical status in aging and AD. Neurology 55484–489 (2000).

    Google Scholar article

  • Schuff, N. et al. MRI of hippocampal volume loss in early Alzheimer’s disease in relation to ApoE genotype and biomarkers. Brain 1321067-1077 (2009).

    CAS Google Scholar Article

  • Zhang, L. et al. Longitudinal trajectory of amyloid-related hippocampal subfield atrophy in nondemented elderly people. Hmm. Brain mapping. 412037-2047 (2020).

    Google Scholar article

  • Reuter, M., Schmansky, NJ, Rosas, HD & Fischl, B. Within-subject model estimation for unbiased longitudinal image analysis. Neuroimaging 611402-1418 (2012).

    Google Scholar article

  • Landau, S. & Jagust, W. Methods of treatment of florbetapir (2015).

  • Buckner, RL et al. A Unified Approach for Analyzing Morphometric and Functional Data in Young, Older, and Demented Adults Using Automated Atlas-Based Head Size Normalization: Reliability and Validation Against Manual Measurement of Head Size total intracranial volume. Neuroimaging 23724–738 (2004).

    Google Scholar article

  • Jack, CR et al. Rates of atrophy accelerate in amnesic mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 701740–1752 (2008).

    Google Scholar article

  • Fitzmaurice, GM, Laird, NM & Ware, JH Applied Longitudinal Analysis (Wiley, 2011).

    Book Google Scholar

  • Satterthwaite, FE An approximate distribution of variance component estimates. Biometer. Bull. 2110 (1946).

    CAS Google Scholar Article

  • Morey, RD, Hoekstra, R., Rouder, JN, Lee, MD & Wagenmakers, EJ The error of placing confidence in confidence intervals. Psychone. Bull. Round. 23103-123 (2016).

    Google Scholar article

  • Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Software 67201–210 (2015).

    Google Scholar article

  • Team, SD Rstan: the R interface to Sta (2020).

  • Sorensen, T., Hohenstein, S. & Vasishth, S. Bayesian Linear Mixed Models Using Stan: A Tutorial for Psychologists, Linguists, and Cognitive Scientists. As to. Psychol methods. 12175-200 (2015).

    Google Scholar article

  • Hubbard, R. Corrupt research: the case for reconceptualizing empirical management and the social sciences (SAGE, 2016). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506305332.

    Book Google Scholar

  • Ziliak, S. & McCloskey, D. The cult of statistical significance: How standard error is costing us jobs, justice and lives (University of Michigan Press, 2008).

    MATH Google Scholar

  • Pocock, SJ & Hughes, MD Estimation issues in clinical trials and insights. Med Statistics 9657–671 (1990).

    CAS Google Scholar Article

  • Lid. et al. Bayesian joint-latent-time mixed-effects model of progression in the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative. Alzheimer’s dementia. Diag. Assess. Say. Monit. ten657–668 (2018).

    Google Scholar

  • Staffaroni, AM et al. Longitudinal multimodal imaging and clinical parameters for frontotemporal dementia clinical trials. Brain 142443–459 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • McKhann, Managing Director et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the working groups of the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association on guidelines for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s dementia. seven263-269 (2011).

    Google Scholar article

  • Albert, MS et al. Diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the working groups of the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association on guidelines for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s dementia. seven270-279 (2011).

    Google Scholar article

  • Share.

    Comments are closed.